##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

In the Philippines, the coastal and marine areas in its numerous small islands provide food, minerals, raw materials, and others contribute significantly to the country’s GDP. However, its environmental governance at the grassroots level is poorly studied. Hence, this study aims to: monitor and evaluate the implementation of the Area Specific Activity Plan (ASAP) of the identified barangays/municipalities; assess the enforcement of environmental laws, namely: a) solid waste management, b) fishery and c) forestry at the barangays of Palawan; and identify the factors which influence the implementation of environmental plans and laws at the barangay level. This study gathered data among 194 respondents from six municipalities and 59 barangays across Palawan. The result shows that the implementation of the environmental plan of activities of municipalities and barangays ranged from "most of the proposed activities are implemented" to "all of the activities are implemented", indicating a high implementation rate of plans and laws across the barangays of Palawan. There are 15 issues and concerns in the implementation of the ASAP, categorize into five factors: funding, capability, legislative, political will, and IEC. The most common factors are funding, capability, legislative, followed by IEC and political will. Gender equity must be factored-in in plans and strategies.

How to Cite

Dalumpines RH, Dagaraga RS, Sariego RS, Manarpaac EP, Lariza CLS, Gonzales BJ, Gonzales-Plasus MMG. 2021. Implementing environmental plans and laws at rural grassroots, Palawan, Philippines: status, factors, and moving forward. The Palawan Scientist. 13(1):59–77. https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2021.13.1.05.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

local governance, environmental management, performance evaluation

References
Adan W. 2010. National ICRM Program, JAO. Integrated Coastal Resource Management, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Visayas Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.

Cameron L. 2016. Grassroots tactics could improve global environmental policies. MSUTODAY. Michigan State University. https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2016/grassroots-tactics-could-improve-global-environmental-policies. Accessed on 12 June 2020.

Chen J and Zhang Q. 2016. Fluctuating policy implementation and problems in grassroots governance. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 3(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1186/s40711-016-0026-1.

Dewitt J. 2006. Top-down, grassroots, and civic environmentalism: three ways to protect ecosystems. Frontiers of Ecology and the Environment, 4(1): 45-51.

Gera W. 2016. Public participation in environmental governance in the Philippines: The challenge of consolidation in engaging the state. Land Use Policy, 52: 501-510

Gonzales BJ. 2011. Status and mechanism of municipal LGU ICRM Plans. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Republic of the Philippines. Integrated Coastal Resource Management Project. 38pp.

Gonzales BJ. 2012. Mainstreaming the Integrated Coastal Resource Management. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Republic of the Philippines. Integrated Coastal Resource Management Project. 21pp.

Hansen JG, Song AM, Gonzales BJ and Becira JG. 2007. CRM capabilities of local government units within Palawan, Philippines: an assessment in Municipalities of Balabac, Roxas, and El Nido. WPU-Technical Report. 16pp.

Immink MDC. 2011. Creating an enabling policy and legislative environment for the right to food actions at grassroots levels, the Zanzibar Experience. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agriculture, and Economic Development Analysis Division, 14pp.

Kardos M. 2012. The reflection of good governance in sustainable development strategies. 8th International Strategic Management Conference. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58: 1166-1173.

Pestaño-Smith R, Courtney CA, Grieser MY and Sia AE. 1999. Into the Mainstream: Promoting Coastal Resource Management on the Philippine National Agenda. Coastal Resource Management Project. Cebu City, Philippines. A paper presented at the GreenCOM International Symposium, Regal Hotel, and North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE) Conference, Hyatt Hotel, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, on 29 August 1999.

PIN (People in Need) 2017. 2017-2021 Global Strategy for Good Governance, People in Need, Czech Republic. 10pp.

Taylor Z. 2016. Good governance at the local level: meaning and measurement. IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance Technical Report No. 26, University of Toronto.

Republic of the Philippines 1991. Republic Act No. 7160, An act providing for local government code of 1991. Republic of the Philippines, Congress of the Philippines, Metro Manila, Eighth Congress, 10 October 1991.

Riggs PW. 2003. Key Address: Coastal Management in the context of political devolution. Integrated Coastal Management Experiences in the Philippines (Proceedings of the Integrated Coastal Management Practitioners Convention in the Philippines, 10-12 November 1998, Davao City, Philippines). Los Banos Laguna, Philippines: Philippine Council for Aquatic and Marine Research and Development (PCAMRD).

Rodrik D. 2008. Thinking about Governance. In: North D, Acemuglo D, Fukuyama F and Rodrik D (Reflection). Governance, Growth, and Development Decision-making. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 17-24.

UN (United Nations). 2020. Governance in Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=1545. Accessed on 20 July 2020.
Section
Original Article