##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

The study described a mentoring program of a state-funded research and its effects on research and reflective practices to graduate students. Participatory Action Research (PAR), designed as a methodical and program framework, engaged nine mentors (researchers of a state-funded research) and 29 graduate students (purposively invited) to training-based mentoring (workshops and field work), small group mentoring (within research cells), and peer mentoring (field work and software-aided coding analysis). Observations, mentors’ narrations, and reflection journals extracted the experiences of the participants on the mentoring program. These reflections revealed that mentors and mentees learned many skills in the mentoring program. They had transformed challenges and difficulties (time management, field work) into learning episodes leading to reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action. They realized the importance of the theory-practice-reflection paradigm in all research endeavors. Hence, PAR-influenced mentoring helped develop their research skills. However, low engagement of the others may be due to time aspect, which may be looked into in a replicated study.

How to Cite

Morales MPE, Palisoc CP, Avilla RA, Anito Jr. JC, Elipane LE, Ayuste TOD, Ramos-Butron B, Alcantara EC, Sagun RD, Bernarte RP, et al. 2022. A participatory action research (PAR)-influenced mentoring program for graduate students. The Palawan Scientist. 14(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2022.14.1.01.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

collaborative practice and action, learning episodes, reflective-practitioner, research skills

References
Arrieta MI, Wells NK, Parker LL, Hudson AL and Crook ED. 2018. Research apprenticeship and its potential as a distinct model of peer research practice. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 12(2): 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2018.0040

Aspfors J and Fransson G. 2015. Research on mentor education of new qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48: 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.004

Burke KJ and Hadley HL. 2018. "I'm empowered by a better connection": Youth participatory action research and critical literacy. The High School Journal, 101(4): 217-235.

CHED (Commission on Higher Education) 2012. CHED Memorandum Order No. 46, Series of 2012, Policy-standard to enhance Quality Assurance (QA) in Philippine Higher Education through an Outcomes-based and Typology-based QA. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.46-s2012.pdf. Accessed on 22 April 2021.

Conchada MIP and Tiongco MM. 2015. A review of the accreditation system for Philippine higher education institutions. https://dirp3.pids.gov.ph/webportal/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1530.pdf. Accessed on 21 November 2021.

Current trends in higher education. 2014. https://study.com/academy/lesson/current-trends-in-higher-education.html. Accessed on 22 April 2021.

Darwin A. 2000. Critical reflections of mentoring in work settings. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(3): 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417130022087008

Darwin A. 2015. Graduates giving back – a mentoring program for MBA students. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(3): 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2015-0009

Darwin A and Palmer E. 2009. Mentoring circles in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(2): 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360902725017

Dominguez N and Hager M. 2013. Mentoring frameworks: Synthesis and critique. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 2(3): 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2013-0014

Feldhaus C and Bentrem K. 2015. STEM mentoring and the use of the principles of adult mentoring inventory. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(3): 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-11-2014-0039

Higgins MC and Kram KE. 2001. Reconceptualising mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 264-288. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378023

Joubert A and de Villiers J. 2015. The learning experiences of mentees and mentors in a nursing school’s mentoring programme. Curationis, 38(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1145

Kemmis S and McTaggart R. 1988. The action research planner. Deakin University Press, Victoria, Australia. 154pp.

Kiersma ME, Hagemeier N, Chen AMH, Melton B, Noureldin M and Plake KS. 2012. A graduate student mentoring program to develop interest in research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(6): 104(1)-104(9). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe766104

Khoo S, Zhao J, Walker A, Kirkman J and Spehar B. 2019. Transitions and choices: Graduate student mentoring for psychology honors students. Student Success, 10(1): 147-154. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i1.648

Koehler MJ and Mishra P. 2008. Introducing TPCK. In: AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (ed). The Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators. Routledge, Oxfordshire, England, UK, pp. 3-29.

Kram KE. 1985. Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(3): 454-456. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392687

Levinson DJ. 1986. The seasons of a man’s life: the groundbreaking 10-year study that was the basis for Passages! Ballentine Books, New York City, New York. 384pp.

Lodge JM, Kennedy G, Lockyer L, Arguel A and Pachman M. 2018. Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Education, 3: 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049

Martin K. 2017. 5 Collaborative practices that impact learning. https://katielmartin.com/2017/09/24/5-collaborative-practices-that-impact-learning/. Accessed on 22 April 2021.

McGowan EM, Stone EM and Kegan R. 2007. A Constructive-Developmental Approach to Mentoring Relationships. In: Ragins BR and Kram KE (eds). The Handbook of Mentoring at Work: Theory, Research, and Practice. Sage Publication, Inc., California, pp. 401-425.

Morales MPE. 2019. Participatory Action Research (PAR) in Education. In: Mertler CA (ed). The Wiley Handbook of Action Research in Education. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp. 317-341.

NEDA (National Economic and Development Authority) 2017. Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022. http://pdp.neda.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/PDP-2017-2022-10-03-2017.pdf. Accessed on 23 April 2021.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018. Future of education and skills Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf. Accessed on 23 April 2021.

Ofreneo MAP. 2014. A profile of graduate education programs in the Philippines. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/webportal/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidspn1406.pdf. Accessed on 23 April 2021.

Reason P and Bradbury H. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage Publications Ltd, London. 719pp.

Reh JF. 2019. A guide to understanding the role of a mentor. https://www.thebalancecareers.com/a-guide-to-understanding-the-role-of-a-mentor-2275318. Accessed on 23 April 2021.

Stratton-Berkessel R. 2020. Appreciative Inquiry-overview of method, principles and applications. Positivity strategist. https://positivitystrategist.com/appreciative-inquiry/. Accessed on 21 November 2021.

Tanhueco-Tumapon T. 2016. Research mentorship-practice, problems, the path-goal theory and models Part 1. The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/2016/06/16/featured-columns/columnists/research-mentorship-practice-problems-the-path-goal-theory-and-models/268213. Accessed on 16 November 2021.

Tocino-Smith J. 2020. How to apply appreciative inquiry: a visual guide. https://positivepsychology.com/appreciative-inquiry-process. Accessed on 23 April 2021.

VERBI Software. 2019. MAXQDA 2018 [computer software]. Berlin, Germany: VERVI Software. https://www.maxqda.com/qualitative-analysis-software?fbclid=IwAR1lz-Lh_rAPl2ifh1Iav9qtXzErp2BTOsQH4m8fNXk66Jirk9jhJ6BYtOQ. Accessed on 20 February 2022.

Won M-R and Choi Y-J. 2017. Undergraduate student nursing mentors’ experiences of peer mentoring in Korea: A qualitative analysis. Nurse Education Today, 51: 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.023

Zachary JL and Fischler LA. 2009. The Mentee’s Guide: Making Mentoring Work for You. Jossey-Bass, New Jersy, USA. 164pp
Section
Original Article