##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

Science, technology, and innovation (STI) are essential to attaining sustainable development. However, utilizing any development platform requires proper planning. In the Philippines, there is limited guidance for systematically mainstreaming or integrating STI into local plans, making it difficult for local governments to effectively use STI for local development. This study employed a quantitative, exploratory, descriptive-correlational case study design to examine the Masbate Framework for STI Planning, which was implemented during a workshop for mainstreaming STI into the Comprehensive Development Plan of the Municipality of Mandaon, Province of Masbate. It applied futures thinking to formulate the development vision; problem and objective tree analysis to identify development issues, goals, and objectives; vision-reality gap analysis to determine development gaps and identifying the programs, projects, and activities that would address them; and project planning and prioritization. This study examines how workshop participants perceived the planning process and whether their satisfaction with the workshop stages was associated with their optimism about the outcomes of applying STI to development. Using post-workshop survey data and the chi-squared test, the study examines the association between participants’ workshop satisfaction and their optimism about STI-based development. Findings indicate that participants generally reported high optimism about STI and development. Significant associations were observed only for the stages involving the identification and prioritization of programs, projects, and activities. This study provides exploratory insights into how a structured STI planning workshop may help strengthen stakeholder confidence in STI-oriented development, while also pointing to the need for further testing in other local government contexts.

How to Cite

Asilum JB. 2026. Promoting stakeholder optimism about local development through science, technology, and innovation planning. The Palawan Scientist. 18(2):in press. https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2026.18.2.01.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

planning process, science town, smart and sustainable communities, STI policy, workshop design

References
Abas A, Arifin K, Ali MAM, Khairil M. 2023. A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development. 46:100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853

Asian Development Bank. 2020. Futures thinking in asia and the pacific: why foresight matters for policy makers. Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS200126-2

Babin BJ, Griffin M. 1998. The nature of satisfaction: An updated examination and analysis. Journal of Business Research. 41(2):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00001-5

Commission on Audit. 2022. Mandaon executive summary 2022. Commission on Audit. [accessed 2024 Jan 10]. https://www.coa.gov.ph/wpfd_file/mandaon-executive-summary-2022/.

Conversano C, Rotondo A, Lensi E, Vista OD, Arpone F, Reda MA. 2010. Optimism and its impact on mental and physical well-being. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health. 6:25–29. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901006010025

Department of Finance. 2024. Department Order No. 073-2024: Schedule of income classification for the first general income reclassification of provinces, cities, and municipalities based on the income ranges under Republic Act No. 11964. Department of Finance. [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://blgf.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/04.-BLGF-MC-No.-020.2024.pdf.

DILG (Department of the Interior and Local Government). 2017. Local planning illustrative guide: preparing and updating the comprehensive development plan (CDP). Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG). [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://www.dilg.gov.ph/PDF_File/reports_resources/dilg-reports-resources-2017110_298b91787e.pdf.

DOST (Department of Science and Technology). 2020. DOST Administrative Order No. 010 Series of 2020: Guidelines for the implementation of the DOST program on Innovation, Science and Technology for Accelerating Regional Technology-Based Development (iSTART). Department of Science and Technology (DOST). [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://www.dost.gov.ph/phocadownload/Downloads/Resources/Issuances/Administrative_Orders/2020/DOST-AO-010-2020.pdf.

DOST-PCIEERD. 2021. DOST Framework for smart sustainable communities and cities. Department of Science and Technology (DOST)-Philippine Council for Industry, Energy and Emerging Technology Research and Development (PCIEERD). [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://pcieerd.dost.gov.ph/images/pdf/2021/roadmaps/sectoral_roadmaps_division/etdd/DOST-Smarter-City-Framework_Draft-1-ao-8.4.2021-1.pdf.

Gabriel A, Camargo M, Montcolo D, Boly V, Bourgault M. 2016. Improving the idea selection process in creative workshops through contextualisation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 135:1503–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.039

High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. 2021. Mobilizing science, technology, and innovation and strengthening the science-policy-society interface. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/27892BN_HLPF_2021__Science_technology_and_innovation.pdf.

Jaljalis DFA, Liwanag LMAL, Liwanag LAL. 2026. Challenges in agricultural extension: Views of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Agrarian Reform (MAFAR) municipal officers in Basilan Province, Philippines. The Palawan Scientist. 18(1):63-73. https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2026.18.1.07

Jenster PV. 1987. Using critical success factors in planning. Long Range Planning. 20(4):102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(87)90160-9

Kim HY. 2017. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics. 42(2):152–155. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152

LGU (Local Government Unit) Mandaon. 2021. Comprehensive development plan 2021-2027 of the municipality of Mandaon. Municipal Planning and Development Office of the Local Government Unit (LGU) of the Municipality of Mandaon.

Long X. 2019. Scientific and technological innovation related to real economic growth. China Political Economy. 2(1):108–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/CPE-04-2019-0012

Marcelo P. 2024. Pasig LGU, DOST-NCR Sign partnership to implement smart and sustainable city program through iSTART. Department of Science and Technology-National Capital Region. [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://ncr.dost.gov.ph/pasig-lgu-dost-ncr-sign-partnership-to-implementsmart-and-sustainable-city-program-through-istart/.

Mormina M. 2019. Science, technology and innovation as social goods for development: rethinking research capacity building from Sen’s capabilities approach. Science and Engineering Ethics. 25:671–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0037-1

NAST PHL. 2021. PAGTANAW 2050: The Philippine foresight on science, technology, and innovation. Transactions of the National Academy of Science and Technology Philippines (NAST PHL). 45:359–369. https://doi.org/10.57043/transnastphl.2021.1792

PSA (Philippine Statistics Authority). 2024. PSA Releases the 2021 city and municipal level poverty estimates. Philippine Statistics Authority. [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://psa.gov.ph/content/psa-releases-2021-city-and-municipal-level-poverty-estimates.

PSA (Philippine Statistics Authority). 2025. 2024 Census of population. Philippine Statistics Authority.

Purnus A, Bodea CN. 2014. Project prioritization and portfolio performance measurement in project oriented organizations. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 119:339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.039

Regional Resource Centre for Asia and the Pacific. Objective tree analysis to identify the “ideal state”. green product award. [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://www.gp-award.com/downloads/Objective-Tree-Analysis.pdf.

Şener S, Sarıdoğan E. 2011. The effects of science-technology-innovation on competitiveness and economic growth. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 24:815–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.127

Serote E. 2008. Rationalizing the local planning system. First edition. Quezon City: Bureau of Local Government and Development.

Sicat CJ, Mariano MA, Castillo AF, Adaro C, Maddawin RC. 2019. Discussion Paper Series No. 2019-18: Assessment of the Philippine local government planning and budgeting framework. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1918.pdf.

Sigue JB. 2023. DOST Names 80 LGUs under smart and sustainable program at the 2023 NSTW, DICT aligns digital cities for countryside empowerment. Jocelle Batapa Sigue. [accessed 2025 Jan 10]. https://jocellebatapasigue.com/2023/12/01/dost-names-80-lgus-under-smart-and-sustainable-program-at-the-2023-nstw-dict-aligns-digital-cities-for-countryside-empowerment/.

Surana K, Singh A, Sagar AD. 2020. Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve sustainable development goals: lessons from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 157:120057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120057

Ugoni A, Walker BF. 1995. The Chi square test: An introduction. COMSIG review. 4(3):61–64.

Wagle B. 1971. Management science and strategic planning. Long Range Planning. 3(3):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(71)90018-5

Walsh PP, Murphy E, Horan D. 2020. The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technology Forecasting and Social Change. 154:119957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119957
Section
Original Article