##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

The Philippines, which is located in the western Pacific region experiences frequent and destructive disasters. Evacuation is one of the measures to reduce the impacts of disasters. Understanding evacuation behavior and incorporating this into a comprehensive evacuation plan is still needed. This study aimed to understand the evacuation behavior of households from the area at high risk of the impacts of a volcanic eruption. The type of evacuation decision, mode, and accommodation type choice behavior were assessed, and models were developed for each of these evacuation-related behaviors. Discrete choice models were used to identify significant factors to evacuation behavior using actual evacuation data collected from households in Barangay Leynes, Talisay, Batangas, Philippines. Results showed that the calculated pseudo-R2 for the three evacuation-related models were in the range of 0.10-0.33, indicating an acceptable level of data fit in respective models. Additionally, the calculated area under the curve (AUC) for the three models range from 0.72 to 0.85 which means that the models’ level of discrimination was acceptable. Also, results of the internal validation calculated likelihood ratio (LR) were 0.83, 0.85 and 0.75, for the type of evacuation decision, mode, and accommodation type choice, respectively. These LR values are less than the critical values, indicating that model validity was established. In terms of significant factors, results showed that evacuation behavior was affected either positively or negatively by some sociodemographic and other variables such as number of household members, source of evacuation warning and vehicle ownership. The significant factors found in this study can be used in developing strategies for future evacuation operations.

How to Cite

Lim MBB, Anabo JML. 2024. Evacuation behavior of 2020 Taal volcano eruption-affected households in Barangay Leynes, Talisay, Batangas, Philippines. The Palawan Scientist. 17(1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2025.17.1.05.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

accommodation type, destination choice, emergency, evacuation decision, evacuation mode choice, evacuation plan

References
Baker EJ. 1991. Hurricane evacuation behavior. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9(2): 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072709100900210

Bian R, Wilmot CG, Gudishala R and Baker EJ. 2019. Modeling household-level hurricane evacuation mode and destination type joint choice using data from multiple post-storm behavioral surveys. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technology, 99: 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.009.

Chen C, Lindell M and Wang H. 2021. Tsunami preparedness and resilience in the Cascadia Subduction Zone: A multistage model of expected evacuation decisions and mode choice. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59: 102244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102244

CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters). 2020. Disaster year in review (2019). https://cred.be/sites/default/files/CC58.pdf. Accessed on 14 May 2021.

Favereau M, Robledo L and Bull M. 2018. Analysis of risk assessment factors of individuals in volcanic hazards: Review of the last decade. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 357: 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.05.009

Golshani N, Shabanpour R, Mohammadian A, Auld J and Ley H. 2019. Analysis of evacuation destination and departure time choices for no-notice emergency events. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 15(2): 896-914. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1546778

Hasan S, Mesa-Arango R and Ukkusuri S. 2013. A random-parameter hazard-based model to understand household evacuation timing behavior. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 27: 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.06.005

Huang SK, Lindell MK and Prater CS. 2016. Who leaves and who stays? A review and statistical meta-analysis of hurricane evacuation studies. Environment and Behavior, 48(8): 991-1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515578485

Huibregtse O, Bliemer M and Hoogendoorn S. 2010. Analysis of near-optimal evacuation instructions. Procedia Engineering, 3: 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.018

IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross). 2018. World disasters report 2018. https://reliefweb.int/sites/relie fweb.int/files/resources/B-WDR-2018-EN-LR-compressed.pdf. Accessed on 14 May 2021.

Lechner H and Rouleau M. 2019. Should we stay or should we go now? Factors Affecting Evacuation Decisions at Pacaya Volcano, Guatemala. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 40: 101160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101160

Lim MB, Lim H, Piantanakulchai M, and Uy FA. 2016a. A household-level flood evacuation decision model in Quezon City, Philippines. Natural Hazards, 80: 1539–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2038-6

Lim H, Lim MB and Piantanakulchai M. 2016b. Determinants of household flood evacuation mode choice in a developing country. Natural Hazards, 84: 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2436-4.

Lim MB, Lim H and Piantanakulchai M. 2019. Flood evacuation decision modeling for high-risk urban area in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Management Review 29: 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.01.001

Lim MB, Lim H and Anabo J. 2021. Evacuation destination choice behavior of households in Eastern Samar, Philippines during the 2013 Typhoon Haiyan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 56: 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102137

Lim HJ, Lim MB and Rojas AW. 2022a. Towards modelling of evacuation behavior and planning for emergency logistics due to the Philippine Taal Volcanic eruption in 2020. Natural Hazards, 114: 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05401-z

Lim HJ, Lim MB and Camposano RL. 2022b. Modeling evacuation behavior of households affected by the eruption of Taal volcano, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109: 103393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103393

Lindell MK and Perry RW. 1992. Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Washington DC: Hemisphere Press. 309 pages

Lindell MK and Perry RW. 1987. Warning mechanisms in emergency response systems. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5: 137-153.

Lindell MK and Prater CS. 2007. Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation analysis for private vehicles: Examples from hurricane research and planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 133: 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2007)133:1(18)

Liu S, Murray-Tuite P, and Schweitzer L. 2014 Uniting multi-adult households during emergency evacuation planning. Disasters, 38(3): 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12063

Manandhar R and Siebeneck LK. 2021. Information management and the return-entry process: Examining information needs, sources, and strategies after Superstorm Sandy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 53: 102015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102015

Mesa-Arango R, Hasan S, Ukkusuri S and Murray-Tuite P. 2013. Household-level model for hurricane evacuation destination type choice using Hurricane Ivan data. Natural Hazards Review, 14(1): 11–20. https://doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000083

Nagarajan M and Shaw D. 2021. A behavioural simulation study of allocating evacuees to public emergency shelters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55: 102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102083

NDRRMC (National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Council). 2020. Situational Report No. 40 re Taal Volcano Eruption. https://ndrrmc.gov.ph/. Accessed on 20 April 2021.

Pel A, Hoogendoorn S and Bliemer M. 2011. A review on travel behaviour modeling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations. Transportation, 39: 97-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9320-6

Roy K and Hasan S. 2021. Modeling the dynamics of hurricane evacuation decisions from twitter data: An input output hidden Markov modeling approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 123: 102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.102976

Sadri AM, Ukkusuri SV, Murray-Tuite P and Gladwin H. 2014. Analysis of hurricane evacuee mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technology, 48: 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.008

Siebeneck L, Schumann R, Kuenanz BJ, Lee S, Benedict BC, Jarvis CM and Ukkusuri SV. 2020. Returning home after Superstorm Sandy: phases in the return-entry process. Natural Hazards, 101: 195-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03869-1

Thompson RR, Garfin DR and Silver RC. 2017. Evacuation from natural disasters: a systematic review of the literature. Risk analysis, 37(4): 812-839. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12654

Wang Y, Kyriakidis M and Dang V. 2021. Incorporating human factors in emergency evacuation – An overview of behavioral factors and models. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 60: 102254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102254

Wu C, Lindell K and Prater S. 2012. Logistics of hurricane evacuation in Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(4): 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.03.005
Section
Original Article