##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

The Makiling Botanic Gardens (MBG) is an educational and eco-tourism site located within the vicinity of Mount Makiling, a dormant volcano susceptible to landslides, and located less than 20 km away from at least two tectonic faults. The study assessed the seismic-induced landslide hazards in the recreational area of MBG mainly based on three parameters: factor of safety (FS), yield acceleration (ay), and slope displacement (Dn). Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) served as the primary method for obtaining the shear strength of the soil within the area. Meanwhile, other relevant parameters, including material unit weight and internal angle of friction, were determined through laboratory testing, correlations, and available data and models. Moreover, the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) and Spectral Acceleration (SA) values were obtained through an interpretation of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) study of the Philippines. Using the ArcGIS software, an FS map, yield acceleration map, and slope displacement map were generated. Results showed that the slopes within the area exhibit static stability. However, in the event of an earthquake, it is expected that the amplified PGA will exceed the expected yield acceleration values of the slopes in some parts of the recreational area, which could result in dynamic instability and slope displacements as high as 130 mm. Thus, the recreational area of MBG possesses some susceptibility towards a seismic-induced landslide.

How to Cite

Aguirre JJC, Borja CB, Cruz AC. 2023. Seismic-induced landslide hazard analysis of the recreational area of the Makiling Botanic Gardens, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. The Palawan Scientist. 15(2):69–84. https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2023.15.2.07.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

dynamic cone penetration test, factor of safety, Newmark displacement, peak ground acceleration, spectral acceleration

References
ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity. 2013. Mt Makiling Forest Reserve. https://asean.chm-cbd.net/mt-makiling-forest-reserve. Accessed on 26 September 2021.

Atkinson J. 2008. Rules of Thumb in Geotechnical Engineering. New Zealand Geotechnical Society: CY Chin, Auckland. 13pp.

Bradley BA. 2011. Empirical correlation of PGA, spectral accelerations and spectrum intensities from active shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 40(15): 1707-1721. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1110

California State of Water Resources Control Board. 2001. Slope Stabilization Techniques. California Waterboards. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/lahontan/water_issues/programs/storm_water/docs/Chapter06.pdf. Accessed on 19 March 2022.

Das BM. 2010. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (7th ed.). Cengage Learning. 666pp.

Herath A, Mohammad L, Gaspard K, Gudishala R and Abu-farsakh M. 2005. The Use of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer to Predict Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils. Geo-Frontiers Congress 2005. Austin: Amer Society of Civil Engineers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40776(155)2

KBA (Key Biodiversity Areas). 2006. Mount Makiling, Philippines. https://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/site/factsheet/9722. Accessed on 19 September 2021.

Kiyota T, Furuichi H, Hidayat RF, Tada N and Nawir H. 2020. Overview of long-distance flow-slide caused by the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake, Indonesia. Soils and Foundations, 60(3): 722-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.03.015

Kramer SL. 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey. 653pp.

Lapitan PG, Sargento JO and Gaddi RT. 2006. Condition of the Mt. Makiling [Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines] after typhoon Milenyo and its restoration/rehabilitation plan. 2006 FORESPI Symposium: Forest Landscape Restoration an Rehabilitation [Symposium]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, College, Laguna.

Look B. 2007. Handbook of Geotechnical Investigation and Design Tables. London: Taylor & Francis Group. 418pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16520

Maria R. 2016. Summary of Safety Criteria in Design. Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia: Automotive Engineering Research Group. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1501.5285

Montecillo LC. 1983. Total Clay and Organic Matter in Relation to Soil Cation Exchange Capacity. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 8: 41-44.

NAMRIA (National Mapping and Resource Information Authority). 2015. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. https://www.namria.gov.ph/download.php. Accessed on 10 January 2022.

National Structural Code of the Philippines. 2015. Static Force Procedure Section 208.5.4 (7th Edition). Quezon City: Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. 21pp.

Peña R. 2008. Lexicon of Philippine Stratigraphy. Geological Society of the Philippines, Mandaluyong City, Philippines. 364pp.

Peñarubia HC, Johnson KL, Styron RH, Bacolcol TC, Sevilla WG, Perez JS, Bonita JD, Narag IC, Solidum RU, Pagani MM and Allen T. 2020. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis model for the Philippines. GEM's 2018 global hazard and risk models, 36(1_suppl): 44-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019900521

Rojas PM. 2016. Central ad South America: significant but constrained potential for geothermal power generation. Geothermal Power Generation, 667-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100337-4.00023-1

Vertek Team. 2021. What is DCP testing and how does it compare to CPT? https://www.vertekcpt.com/what-is-dcp-testing-and-how-does-it-compare-to-cpt/. Accessed on 19 September 2021.

Veylon G, Merckle S, Luu LH, Bard PY, Carvajal C and Frigo B. 2017. A simplified method for estimating Newmark. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 100: 518-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.07.003
Section
Original Article